Moema: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Thomas (Diskussion | Beiträge) |
Es (Diskussion | Beiträge) (→Arten) |
||
Zeile 20: | Zeile 20: | ||
|} | |} | ||
== Arten == | == Arten == | ||
+ | {| class="wikitable" | ||
+ | |style="width:25%; text-align:center;"|'''a-n''' | ||
+ | |style="width:25%; text-align:center;"|'''m-z''' | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |style="vertical-align:top;"| | ||
{{splast|M|oema|apurinan}} {{aut|Costa}}, 2004<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|apurinan}} {{aut|Costa}}, 2004<br /> | ||
{{splast|M|oema|beucheyi}} {{aut|Valdesalici, Nielsen & Pillet}}, 2015<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|beucheyi}} {{aut|Valdesalici, Nielsen & Pillet}}, 2015<br /> | ||
Zeile 27: | Zeile 32: | ||
{{splast|M|oema|hellneri}} {{aut|Costa}}, 2003<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|hellneri}} {{aut|Costa}}, 2003<br /> | ||
{{splast|M|oema|heterostigma}} {{aut|Costa}}, 2003<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|heterostigma}} {{aut|Costa}}, 2003<br /> | ||
+ | {{splast|M|oema|juanderibaensis}} {{aut|Drawert}}, 2022<br /> | ||
{{splast|M|oema|kenwoodi}} {{aut|Valdesalici}}, 2016<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|kenwoodi}} {{aut|Valdesalici}}, 2016<br /> | ||
{{splast|M|oema|manuensis}} {{aut|(Costa}}, 2003)<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|manuensis}} {{aut|(Costa}}, 2003)<br /> | ||
{{splast|M|oema|nudifrontata}} {{aut|Costa}}, 2003<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|nudifrontata}} {{aut|Costa}}, 2003<br /> | ||
+ | |style="vertical-align:top;"| | ||
{{splast|M|oema|obliqua}} {{aut|(Costa, Sarmiento & Barrera}}, 1996)<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|obliqua}} {{aut|(Costa, Sarmiento & Barrera}}, 1996)<br /> | ||
{{splast|M|oema|ortegai}} {{aut|Costa}}, 2003<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|ortegai}} {{aut|Costa}}, 2003<br /> | ||
Zeile 43: | Zeile 50: | ||
{{splast|M|oema|staecki}} {{aut|(Seegers}}, 1987)<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|staecki}} {{aut|(Seegers}}, 1987)<br /> | ||
{{splast|M|oema|wischmanni}} {{aut|(Seegers}}, 1983)<br /> | {{splast|M|oema|wischmanni}} {{aut|(Seegers}}, 1983)<br /> | ||
+ | |} | ||
== Etymologie == | == Etymologie == |
Version vom 21. November 2022, 17:54 Uhr
Costa, 1989
Familie: Rivulidae SynonymeAphyolebias Costa, 1998 TypusartMoema piriana Costa, 1989 |
Arten
a-n | m-z |
M. apurinan Costa, 2004 |
M. obliqua (Costa, Sarmiento & Barrera, 1996) |
Etymologie
Moema ist das Tupí-Wort für falsch und bezieht sich auf die Verwirrung in der Aquarienliteratur hinsichtlich der Platzierung von Moema piriana in Pterolebias oder Rivulichthys (= Trigonectes). (Übersetzt aus: The ETYFish Project)
Literatur
- Costa, W.J.E.M. 2014. Phylogeny and evolutionary radiation in seasonal rachovine killifishes: biogeographical and taxonomical implications. Vertebrate Zoology, 64 (2): 177-192. Zitatseite [:181, Aphyolebias als jüngeres Synonym zu Moema]
- Costa, W.J.E.M. 1998. Phylogeny and Classification of Rivulidae Revisited: Origin and Evolution of Annualism and Miniaturization in Rivulid Fishes (Cyprinodontiformes: Aplocheiloidei). Journal of Comparative Biology, 3 (1): 33-92. Zitatseite [:78, !!, als Gattung Aphyolebias]
- Huber, J.H. 1996. Killi-Data 1996 (1. Ausgabe). Société Française d'Ichthyologie, Paris. 399pp. Zitatseite [:192, Moema als Untergattung von Trigonectes]
- Costa, W.J.E.M. 1989. Descrição e relações filogenéticas de dois gêneros novos e três espécies novas de peixes anuais neotropicais (Cyprinodontiformes, Rivulidae). Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 49 (1): 221–230. Zitatseite [: 223, !!, als Gattung Moema]