Karen D. Crow: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen

Aus WORLDFISH WIKI
Wechseln zu: Navigation, Suche
(Publikationen)
Zeile 1: Zeile 1:
 
'''{{BASEPAGENAME}}'''  
 
'''{{BASEPAGENAME}}'''  
  
* Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, United States.
+
* Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, California 94132, United States.
  
 
==Publikationen==
 
==Publikationen==
 
{{Swenson et al., 2018}}<!--How the Devil Ray Got Its Horns: The Evolution and Development of Cephalic Lobes in Myliobatid Stingrays-->
 
{{Swenson et al., 2018}}<!--How the Devil Ray Got Its Horns: The Evolution and Development of Cephalic Lobes in Myliobatid Stingrays-->
 
{{Izumiyama et al., 2020}}<!--In the surf zone: Reproductive strategy of the Calico Surfperch (Amphistichus koelzi) in a comparative context-->
 
{{Izumiyama et al., 2020}}<!--In the surf zone: Reproductive strategy of the Calico Surfperch (Amphistichus koelzi) in a comparative context-->
 +
{{Izumiyama et al., 2020a}}<!--Evaluating Reproductive Strategies and Female Bateman Gradients in Ditrema temminckii: Is the Number of Fathers a Good Approximation for the Number of Mates?-->

Version vom 24. September 2020, 06:26 Uhr

Karen D. Crow

  • Department of Biology, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, California 94132, United States.

Publikationen

  • Swenson, J.D., Klomp, J., Fisher, R.A. & Crow, K.D. 2018. How the Devil Ray Got Its Horns: The Evolution and Development of Cephalic Lobes in Myliobatid Stingrays (Batoidea: Myliobatidae). Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 6: 181. (doi) Zitatseite 
  • Izumiyama, M., Westphal, M.F. & Crow, K.D. 2020. In the surf zone: Reproductive strategy of the Calico Surfperch (Amphistichus koelzi) in a comparative context. Journal of Fish Biology, First published:11 February 2020. (doi) Zitatseite 
  • Izumiyama, M., Awata, S. & Crow, K. 2020. Evaluating Reproductive Strategies and Female Bateman Gradients in Ditrema temminckii: Is the Number of Fathers a Good Approximation for the Number of Mates? Copeia, 108 (3): 532-537. (doi) Zitatseite